What is heavy forward but not backward
Walking on hands
Dragging lower body with arms
Etc. Once we have the list "finished" we get up again, and I coach the whole group through each item on the list.
Back to top. Ways to Walk For this second part of the lesson we confine ourselves only to walking. There are many different ways to walk. I introduce the idea that any movement (in this case, the walk) can be changed in a number of different specific ways. I list them below, but in the lesson I generally introduce them one at a time, with time for discussion, etc. in between. Some of the categories below come from Rudolf Laban's movement technique. As the students walk--Don't stop! Keep walking!--through the space, I coach them through each of these changes. ("Okay, everyone, now let's walk as HIGH, as tall, as we can! Now let's see how LOW to the ground we can be and still walk--don't cheat and crawl! Now everyone walk as WIDE as you can!" etc.) Change the size of the movement. A movement can be made wider or narrower, higher or lower, deeper or shallower. One can make the walk wider or narrower by widening or narrowing the stance and swinging the arms further away or closer to the body. Once can make the walk higer or lower by walking on tiptoe or slouching. One can make the walk deeper by taking larger steps or swinging the arms further forward and back.
Change the time of the movement. A movement can be made slower or faster. (When my students are sophisticated enough to grasp it, I include time in the size category--as the "fourth" dimension.)
Change the weight of the movement. This is pure Laban. I demonstrate by walking how a movement can be light or heavy. (An angry schoolteacher may walk heavily; a ballet dancer may move lightly.)
Change the direction of the movement. Also from Laban. A movement can be direct--moving to a specific point without veering off the path--or indirect--wandering aimlessly.
Change the tension of the movement. The muscles can be loose and relaxed or tense and constricted.
Change the focus of the movement. I made up this category, but it is easy for my students to understand and really helps with emotional work. Focus is basically the direction of the gaze, with usually a corresponding curve of the body. (Think of the difference between a downcast person walking about staring at the floor and a proud, happy person striding about with his chin up.)
Back to top. What Does it Mean? Once we have tried out all the different ways to change our walk, I have the students sit around the edge of the space and work with one volunteer moving at a time. This part of the lesson is about body language, and how the way we move expresses our personality and our mood. A volunteer is chosen, and instructed to walk back and forth through the space as everyone watches. To begin with, I say, "Be as HAPPY as you can! Show us in your walk!" As the class watches the volunteer walking "happy," I coach them with questions to look at how the walk is dealing with each of the categories above. "Is he walking high or low?" "Wide or narrow?" "Are his muscles tense or loose?" "Is he walking fast or slow?" Gradually we build up a sense of what "happy" looks like--at least for that person. (With older students, if the volunteer is not actually looking very happy, I may coach him, using the categories, to look happier. "Can you move your focus up? Can you relax your muscles a bit? Look, class, at how much happier he looks now!")
Sometimes I write a brief description of "happy" on the board. (Fairly high, wide and deep walk, medium-fast, light, relaxed, direct movement, high or straight ahead focus.) It is important not to cheat, though. If my volunteer's version of "happy" doesn't conform to my expectations, and if when I coach him to match them the group feels he no longer looks happy, then I describe what he did, not what I think he should have done.
We repeat this with other volunteers and other emotions--angry, proud, sad, afraid, etc. With sophisticated groups, we talk about why certain emotions might have certain similarities or differences. (For example, in certain ways "proud" and "angry" tend in most groups to look a lot alike. Both tend to be tense, fairly deliberate movements that take up a lot of space, both in width and in depth. It can be fascinating to discuss theories as to why.)
This is really a broad outline of the general approach I take when introducing the idea of movement with my classes. I vary the approach nearly every time I do it, carefully listening and watching so that I can respond to what the students are and are not connecting to. I would be glad to discuss further the kinds of things we talk about in this unit with anyone who is interested. You can e-mail me at any time.Source: www.childdrama.com